What do you notice about the way the members communicate?

o to a church service that serves a specific ethnicity other than your own and, if possible, one that uses another language.

Spend at least an hour, more if possible, observing the setting. What do you notice about the way the members communicate? How close do they stand when they are talking? Do they touch each other? What does what they wear communicate about them? If you get a chance to eat with them, how are the foods and other items presented in ways that seem unusual or different to you?

Watch and listen to the people. What gestures do they use? Do they seem to know when and how to do things that you do not know?

Write an essay of 500-750 words about the experience. Where did you go? Who went with you? How long did you stay? What did you notice, especially about the way the people interacted? To what do you attribute the differences you saw?

Reflect on how much this experience stretched your comfort zone and how this observation could affect your intercultural communication.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top of Form Ethnic Church Observation   1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 75.0 %Content   35.0 %Observations of a Church With an Ethnicity Other Than Your Own Does not attend a church with an ethnicity other than their own. Does not provide any observations. Attends a church with an ethnicity other than their own. Provides a vague description of where they went, who went with them, and how long they stayed. Provides a vague description of how people interacted. Provides a vague description of what attributed to the differences they saw. Attends a church with an ethnicity other than their own. Provides a description of where they went, who went with them, and how long they stayed. Provides a description of how people interacted. Provides a description of what attributed to the differences they saw. Attends a church with an ethnicity other than their own. Provides a clear description of where they went, who went with them, and how long they stayed. Provides a clear description of how people interacted. Provides a clear description of what attributed to the differences they saw. Attends church with an ethnicity other than their own. Provides a thorough description of where they went, who went with them, and how long they stayed. Provides a thorough description of how people interacted. Provides a thorough description of what attributed to the differences they saw. 40.0 %Reflection on How the Observation Could Affect Their Intercultural Communication Does not provide a reflection on how the observation could have affected their intercultural communication. Provides a reflection that vaguely describes how the observation could have affected their intercultural communication Provides a reflection that describes how the observation could have affected their intercultural communication Provides a reflection that clearly describes how the observation could have affected their intercultural communication Provides a reflection that thoroughly describes how the observation could have affected their intercultural communication 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness   7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 5.0 %Format   5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 100 %Total Weightage

Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]