Author: Custom Essay

According to our instructor, the assignment reflects our major (discipline), so in my case, my major (or discipline) is Communication

And in the first part OBJECTIVE A on the instructions paper, it says: “Map the two preliminary disciplines required for you to create an INDS
research portfolio. Provide the following:…”

I just wanted the writer to know that all the part where it says something like “two preliminary disciplines” or “two disciplines” to just ignore that because it is meant for students of 2 majors (or disciplines) but since I am one of the Communication Major students then the writer may focus on Communication alone.

I think it would be best that the writer reads the instructions I have attached. And if he/she has any questions I will be ready to answer them

but most of what you need to know is that I am a Communication Major Student, And in OBJECTIVE B part of the instructions paper, I am the second type of Inter disciplinarian Character.

I could not understand what the professor had requested so I need some help. Each point under the objective can be answered in a form of 3-5 sentence short paragraphs. My classmates had 2 pages so I do not want to add more

In the part where it says –
Phenomena: What is a typical “event” or “situation” observed by your discipline for
investigation? Provide a recent article from each discipline and write a summary of the
article.

I was thinking of different recent events and I could not come up with anything good, and the only thing in my mind was the ice bucket challenge that happened recently and how it can play a major role in this assignment. Or the other event is Jeremy Clarkson from the UK TV show Top Gear just got fired after almost 20 seasons playing on air.

I have also attached my first draft which was bad but just for reference to understand the assignment better. And to see my style of writing, I am an international student so my English is not perfect.

I also attached the book by Repko for any reference needed

Thank you for your cooperation and help and message me for any questions

I want you to write an analysis of Philip Zimbardo’s “Stanford Prison Experiment.” The primary goal of this assignment is for you to develop a critical perspective on Zimbardo’s essay that utilizes an outside source which I uploaded, to help you develop your argument. A analysis doesn’t need to be a complete take-down of the text at hand, and on the other end of the spectrum, it also need to be full-scale showering of praise on the text. Instead, a good analysis engages specific aspects of the text in order to make a point about what you believe are the important issues in the text. Think of your outside source – Which I uploaded – as a way to help you articulate and reflect on the big picture – the larger issues and questions surrounding zimbardo’s study (for example, the nature of evil, or the relation between individual identity and role-playing, or the complex nature of authority and obedience, etc.) A good analysis will always address one or several of these larger issues. Use this big picture issues ( Which should be addressed by your thesis statement) as an organizational/structural principle for your essay. In other words, every point you make in the body of your paper should connect to develop what you are arguing in your thesis statement about the big picture. Your second source, must play a central role in helping you elaborate argument, and “MUST BE MENTIONED IN YOUR THESIS STATEMENT” * Read the zimbardo’s experiment and second source Disobedience as a psychological and moral problem, and utilize the second source to perfectly analysis Zimbardo’s Experiment *
(((((( Format)))): This must be a well-structured essay with an introduction and a conclusion, and with an argumentative and detailed thesis statement at the end of your introduction and the start of your conclusion Set the stage by introducing the main ideas or concerns that you will be discussing in the body of the essay. Make sure to introduce *BOTH* sources in your introductory paragraph, as well as what you will be saying about them. Your thesis statement, coming at the end of the introduction, should clearly and specifically lay out the original point you will be making. Begin your first body paragraph with a short summary of Zimbardo’s Experiment. From here, transition to your analysis of Zimbardo, THE SUMMARY MUST NOT BE LONGER THAN A PAGE. Your priority in this essay is critique, and your critique should be structured according to the needs of the argument that you are making. This means that there is no set format for how you bring in your second source, as long as you incorporate it in a way that sharpens and develops your argument. Do not spend more than three sentences summarizing your second source. First Paragraph: – Introduce your sources – Thesis – Introduce your topic – A short summary ( no longer than a page for the experiment, no longer than 3 sentences for the second source) – Switch to critical mode and start building argument. Please read these details and pay attention to them. Also, read the zimbardo’s experiment “First source which you will analysis”, and the second source (Walker+Percy) ” Which you will use to support your critique” Thank you:*

Also give title from your own words
Moreover, don’t forget the Works Cited

Hello, alright this project is very sensitive and needs to be read carefully, I had to do a lesson plan for a social study theme for my midterm and after I did it, it came out wrong and I need to fix it.

Now I will upload,

1) the Lesson Plan I did and came out wrong

2) A paper that has the professor’s feed back common on the lesson Plan I did. and the complete instruction on how to do the paper.

3) a copy of a lesson plan format example which is the same format from number one paper but check it out to make sure ur on the right track.

AGAIN READ ALL THE INFORMATION CAREFULLY AND MAKE SURE YOU FOLLOW IT WORD FOR WORD AND ALSO PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE PROFESSORS FEED BACK AND WHAT HE NEEDS.

ALSO PROOF READ YOUR WORK

Watch Brian Kennedy’s TedTalk: Brian Kennedy: Visual Literacy and Why We Need It (http://tedxtalks.ted.com/video/TEDxDartmouth-Brian-Kennedy-Vis;search%3Abrian%20kennedy), and address the followings:

1.Compare and contrast Kennedy’s definition of visual literacy with the textbook’s definition.
2.Which of the two definitions do you believe is more accurate in today’s world? Discuss and support your position.
3.Explain how visual literacy can be considered a universal language.
4.Discuss how visual literacy can impact communication and global understanding..
Submit to your instructor your two- to three-page paper (not including the title and reference pages). Your paper must be formatted according to APA style as outline in the approved APA style guide, and

write up a one-page report on the event

There will be no classroom lecture on Thursday March 19th. Watch this online Guest Lecture by Erin on Agile online. About half way through the Lecture, Erin discusses the difference between the Iron Triangle of Waterfall and Agile. Use on full page to discuss the difference and weather Agile could be used on our individual project.

Please use the book: Love to turn you on

How does gender-centric thinking lead to misunderstandings about what each gender wants in intimacy?

What does the author mean when he writes ‘leaping across the abyss’ in order to understand the other gender?

According to this author what are some of the biggest challenges in learning to become better lovers?

Do your ideas about the frequency of ‘bad sex’ and possible benefits of more thoughtful lovemaking correlate, conflict with or expand on the author’s ideas? Please explain.

Did you find the conversation between men in their 20’s, an effective vehicle for articulating the author’s ideas?

What do you think about the idea that females need to feel trust and love from their sexual partners? Do you think the same is true for men?

Do you think the approach promoted by the author for making love to a woman is true in all cases? Why?

What age are you and do you think this book would be of benefit to others? Why or why not?

Do you believe males and females differ significantly in their levels of sexual desires and intentions? Why?

sources is interview,

i upload 2 drafts and you must read them and must use my writing format to do paper, otherwise the teacher will conside plagiarism thanks.

Hello, I need helping getting started on my ORIGINAL personal statement and knowing what to include. I know personal statements are very specific and personalized so I was wondering how I could request one and what information I need to provide you with?

I already have around a 12 page paper. I would just like for you to tweek some of papers inferstructer. Originally I thought it was supposed to be over one film, but it’s supposed to be over two. I would like you to interpret reservoir dogs into the paper and talk about “Rhetorical analysis” most of it is already done. All I would like is to for you to review the paper, change what you deemed fit, add on two pages on content (preferably reservoir dogs) and then add in the rhetorical analysis, “logos, ethos, and pathos and big picture implactions” The paper has to be a minimum 4,000 words. I’m around 3,500. Remember it all goes into Rhetorical Analysis of the two films. Thank you.