What are the considerations that you need to be aware of to remain competitive?

-3 Pages: Cultural Considerations

You, Mike, and Tiffany meet in a conference room to begin to assemble your final presentation.

This presentation will be the project deliverable, so you want to make sure you have provided all of the requirements.

Mike begins, “I think we’ve done some pretty good analysis on our strategy. We just have to put the pieces together before the final presentation.”

“We do have some solid information, but we have to look at all the parts to see if we can remain competitive,” Tiffany adds.

Complete the following:

  • What are the considerations that you need to be aware of to remain competitive?
  • Based on the research that you have done, can you compete in the market that you have chosen? Why or why not?
  • What primary factors led you to this decision?
  • What would you say to someone who would dispute your position?
  • How do you plan on evaluating the global marketplace in the future?

Describe how these sections are implemented in your selected health care facility.

Review The Joint Commission standards for the type of health care organization

 

PowerPoint presentation of 11–21 slides (200–250 words of speaker notes per slide)

 

Review The Joint Commission standards for the type of health care organization that you chose in Week 1 and that you have used throughout this course. (I have chosen a nursing home as my organization)

 

  • Identify at least two sections of the standards (e.g., environment of care, leadership).
  • Describe how these sections are implemented in your selected health care facility.
  • Make recommendations for improvement.

What principle or principles were neglected in this instance?

HR Discussion board.

For your initial discussion, describe an instance of unfairness or inequality you witnessed in a work situation, where an HRM professional was involved but the situation was not resolved well. Be sure to protect the privacy of the organization and any individuals involved by changing their names for your post. Address the following questions:

  • What principle or principles were neglected in this instance?
  • What duties and responsibilities did the HRM professional neglect?
  • Could this instance have been avoided?
  • What strategies could the HRM professional have implemented to avoid this situation, or bring it to a better resolution?

 

Discussion #2  Explan how the Unemployment Relief Act shapes HRM

 

Each discussion must have 2 references and each answer must be 2 paragraphs long.

 

 

Explain the importance of the legislation as it relates to your issue.

Assignment 2: LASA 1: Taking Action

Assignment 2: LASA 1: Taking Action

In this course, you have been introduced to ethics, social problems, and social policy. This assignment will prompt action from you to help resolve a social issue. You must learn about a problem, find a piece of legislation addressing your concern, and act to help solve the problem.

Using the textbook, the Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet, do the following:

 

1. Identify the Problem

Select and research a social issue based on the course readings or personal interest.

Then, address the following:

  • Define and describe the social issue in detail using a variety of relevant outside sources.
  • Explain the social context of the social issue.
  • Identify and describe ethical concerns related to the social issue.
  • Determine what population is most impacted by the social issue.

2. Find the Legislation

Use credible government sources to find and learn about a piece of legislation related to your chosen social problem or issue.

Then, address the following:

  • Explain how the piece of current legislation relates to the social problem or issue. Make sure you provide a description of the piece of legislation.

3. Write an Advocacy Letter

In order to help resolve the social issue, you must take action. Identify your elected representative(s) and find their contact and e-mail addresses.

Write an advocacy letter regarding the piece of legislation and your support of or opposition to it.

The purpose of an advocacy letter is to support or oppose the legislation that affects a social issue of concern to you. This letter is a way for representatives to stay in touch with the constituents they represent. The letter consists of a brief introduction identifying and addressing the social issue of concern (through personal experience, if applicable), an identification of the piece of current legislation that addresses your chosen issue, and your request advocating your representative to support or oppose the legislation.

Be sure to address the following in your letter:

  • Identify the purpose of your letter.
  • Identify House bill (HR) or Senate bill (S) number of the legislation.
  • Briefly summarize the social problem or issue.
  • Explain the importance of the legislation as it relates to your issue.
  • Advocate for or against the legislation in a knowledgeable and respectful tone. This includes the following:
    • Evaluating the proposed impact of the legislation on target population
    • Proposing possible ways the legislation can influence the social problem or issue

Download and review samples of advocacy letters. Use either of the sample letters as a template for your own letter.

Write a 3–5-page report in Word format that begins with an Advocacy Letter followed by a supporting report of 3–5-pages. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming

Explain what you would expect to learn from application of that tool.

A-plus Writer – Project Risk

Consider the role of simulation analysis and decision trees in capital budgeting risk analysis.    Describe   the advantages offered by each technique.  Describe a scenario that the technique would be appropriate to apply to and explain what you would expect to learn from application of that tool.

Write your response as a one-page memo.  Post your memo in the discussion forum and solicit feedback from your classmates.

Determine the primary and secondary target markets for your company. Next, analyze the primary and secondary target markets that you identified for your company. Be sure to cover the 4Ps, 5Cs and STP.

paper 1

PLAGIARISM FREE

Orininal work Only

PLAGIARISM %0

must be on time

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marketing Plan 1

 

At the end of this course, you will have created a marketing plan for a hypothetical product-based company. Each assignment focuses on a different section of the overall marketing plan. For Assignment 1, you will compile information on the company’s background information, an environmental analysis, your company’s short and long-term goals, and a SWOT analysis.

 

 

Note: You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.

 

Write  (6) page paper in which you:

 

  1. Write an introduction to your company. Describe your company, its location, and the product it makes or the service it provides.
  2. Develop an environmental analysis that includes competitive, economic, political, legal, technological, and sociocultural forces.
  3. Determine the primary and secondary target markets for your company. Next, analyze the primary and secondary target markets that you identified for your company. Be sure to cover the 4Ps, 5Cs and STP.
  4. Decide the main goals that you would like to achieve within the next year (short term) and the mains goals that you would like to achieve within the next five (5) years (long term). Determine the most appropriate ways to measure both short- and long-term goals. Note: Consider the following metrics: tracking downloads of Website content, Website visitors, increases in market share, customer value, new product adoption rates, retention, rate of growth compared to competition and the market, margin, and customer engagement.
  5. Develop both a SWOT analysis and needs analysis for your product. Each analysis should examine four (4) strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for your company.
  6. Use at least four (4) academic resources as quantitative marketing research to determine the feasibility of your product / service. These resources should be industry specific and relate to your chosen product / service. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

    • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
    • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

 

 

Compare international perspectives on corrections and criminal punishment, including comparative sentencing typologies.

Assignment 2 Research Paper Part 1 and Part 2

 

Assignment 2: International Crime Witness, Part 1

 

Due Week 6 and worth 250 points

 

 

 

Use the Internet to research criminal proceedings in one (1) of the six (6) model countries from the textbook. Imagine you are traveling abroad in your chosen country when you witness a local national committing a violent assault. The criminal is arrested and charged by the police.

 

 

 

Upon returning to the United States, a professor in one of your criminal justice classes asks you to complete a written report on your experience.

 

 

 

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

 

  1. Determine the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country.
  2. Examine the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Provide a rationale for the response.
  3. Choose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and analyze the country’s perspective on each right. Provide support for the analysis.
  4. Investigate the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Provide justification for the response.
  5. Classify the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States.
  6. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

 

 

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

 

 

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

  • Compare and contrast American perspectives on criminal law with those of other countries.
  • Evaluate the nature of comparative policing and global law enforcement cooperation.
  • Analyze the role of procedural law in the four (4) major legal traditions.

 

  • Use technology and information resources to research comparative perspectives in criminal justice.
  • Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice topics using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.

 

 

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 

Points: 250 Assignment 2: International Crime Witness, Part 1
Criteria  

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Determine the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Insufficiently determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Partially determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Satisfactorily determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Thoroughly determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country.
2. Examine the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Provide a rationale for the response.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Did not submit or insufficiently provided a rationale for the response. Insufficiently examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Insufficiently provided a rationale for the response. Partially examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Partially provided a rationale for the response. Satisfactorily examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for the response. Thoroughly examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Thoroughly provided a rationale for the response.
3. Choose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and analyze the country’s perspective on each right. Provide support for the analysis.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and did not submit or incompletely analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for the analysis. Insufficiently chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and insufficiently analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Insufficiently provided support for the analysis. Partially chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and partially analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Partially provided support for the analysis. Satisfactorily chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and satisfactorily analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Satisfactorily provided support for the analysis. Thoroughly chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and thoroughly analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Thoroughly provided support for the analysis.
4. Investigate the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Provide justification for the response.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for the response. Insufficiently investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Insufficiently provided justification for the response. Partially investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Partially provided justification for the response. Satisfactorily investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Satisfactorily provided justification for the response. Thoroughly investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Thoroughly provided justification for the response.
5. Classify the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Insufficiently classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Partially classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Satisfactorily classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Thoroughly classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States.
6. 4 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present 7-8 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

 

 

 

Assignment 3: International Crime Witness, Part 2

 

Due Week 8 and worth 250 points

 

 

 

After providing your report to the professor in Assignment 2, the country’s governing body asks you to return to the country and testify in the court proceedings. While you are abroad, your professor asks you to report on the court proceedings and correctional system.

 

 

 

Use the Internet or Strayer databases to research court proceedings and the correctional system in the same country you selected in Assignment 2.

 

 

 

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

 

  1. Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the analysis.
  2. Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Provide justification for your view of the country’s prison system.
  3. Expose two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.
  4. Provide one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Provide justification for the recommendations.
  5. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

 

 

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

 

 

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

  • Evaluate and explain ethical issues inherent in criminal justice systems.
  • Differentiate the role of courts in various societies and in international context.
  • Compare international perspectives on corrections and criminal punishment, including comparative sentencing typologies.

 

  • Use technology and information resources to research comparative perspectives in criminal justice.
  • Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice topics using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.

 

 

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 

Points: 250 Assignment 3: International Crime Witness, Part 2
Criteria  

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the analysis.

Weight: 23%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for the analysis. Insufficiently analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Insufficiently provided support for the analysis. Partially analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Partially provided support for the analysis. Satisfactorily analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Satisfactorily provided support for the analysis. Thoroughly analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Thoroughly provided support for the analysis.
2. Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Provide justification for your view of the country’s prison system.

Weight: 22%

Did not submit or incompletely depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Insufficiently depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Insufficiently provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Partially depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Partially provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Satisfactorily depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Satisfactorily provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Thoroughly depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Thoroughly provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system.
3. Expose two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Insufficiently exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Partially exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Satisfactorily exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Thoroughly exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.
4. Provide one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Provide justification for the recommendations.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for the recommendations. Insufficiently provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Insufficiently provided justification for the recommendations. Partially provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Partially provided justification for the recommendations. Satisfactorily provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Satisfactorily provided justification for the recommendations. Thoroughly provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Thoroughly provided justification for the recommendations.

 

Evaluate the nature of comparative policing and global law enforcement cooperation.

Assignment 2 Research Paper Part 1 and Part 2

 

Assignment 2: International Crime Witness, Part 1

 

Due Week 6 and worth 250 points

 

 

 

Use the Internet to research criminal proceedings in one (1) of the six (6) model countries from the textbook. Imagine you are traveling abroad in your chosen country when you witness a local national committing a violent assault. The criminal is arrested and charged by the police.

 

 

 

Upon returning to the United States, a professor in one of your criminal justice classes asks you to complete a written report on your experience.

 

 

 

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

 

  1. Determine the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country.
  2. Examine the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Provide a rationale for the response.
  3. Choose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and analyze the country’s perspective on each right. Provide support for the analysis.
  4. Investigate the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Provide justification for the response.
  5. Classify the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States.
  6. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

 

 

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

 

 

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

  • Compare and contrast American perspectives on criminal law with those of other countries.
  • Evaluate the nature of comparative policing and global law enforcement cooperation.
  • Analyze the role of procedural law in the four (4) major legal traditions.

 

  • Use technology and information resources to research comparative perspectives in criminal justice.
  • Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice topics using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.

 

 

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 

Points: 250 Assignment 2: International Crime Witness, Part 1
Criteria  

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Determine the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Insufficiently determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Partially determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Satisfactorily determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Thoroughly determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country.
2. Examine the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Provide a rationale for the response.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Did not submit or insufficiently provided a rationale for the response. Insufficiently examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Insufficiently provided a rationale for the response. Partially examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Partially provided a rationale for the response. Satisfactorily examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for the response. Thoroughly examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Thoroughly provided a rationale for the response.
3. Choose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and analyze the country’s perspective on each right. Provide support for the analysis.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and did not submit or incompletely analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for the analysis. Insufficiently chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and insufficiently analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Insufficiently provided support for the analysis. Partially chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and partially analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Partially provided support for the analysis. Satisfactorily chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and satisfactorily analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Satisfactorily provided support for the analysis. Thoroughly chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and thoroughly analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Thoroughly provided support for the analysis.
4. Investigate the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Provide justification for the response.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for the response. Insufficiently investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Insufficiently provided justification for the response. Partially investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Partially provided justification for the response. Satisfactorily investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Satisfactorily provided justification for the response. Thoroughly investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Thoroughly provided justification for the response.
5. Classify the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Insufficiently classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Partially classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Satisfactorily classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Thoroughly classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States.
6. 4 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present 7-8 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

 

 

 

Assignment 3: International Crime Witness, Part 2

 

Due Week 8 and worth 250 points

 

 

 

After providing your report to the professor in Assignment 2, the country’s governing body asks you to return to the country and testify in the court proceedings. While you are abroad, your professor asks you to report on the court proceedings and correctional system.

 

 

 

Use the Internet or Strayer databases to research court proceedings and the correctional system in the same country you selected in Assignment 2.

 

 

 

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

 

  1. Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the analysis.
  2. Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Provide justification for your view of the country’s prison system.
  3. Expose two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.
  4. Provide one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Provide justification for the recommendations.
  5. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

 

 

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

 

 

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

  • Evaluate and explain ethical issues inherent in criminal justice systems.
  • Differentiate the role of courts in various societies and in international context.
  • Compare international perspectives on corrections and criminal punishment, including comparative sentencing typologies.

 

  • Use technology and information resources to research comparative perspectives in criminal justice.
  • Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice topics using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.

 

 

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 

Points: 250 Assignment 3: International Crime Witness, Part 2
Criteria  

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the analysis.

Weight: 23%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for the analysis. Insufficiently analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Insufficiently provided support for the analysis. Partially analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Partially provided support for the analysis. Satisfactorily analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Satisfactorily provided support for the analysis. Thoroughly analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Thoroughly provided support for the analysis.
2. Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Provide justification for your view of the country’s prison system.

Weight: 22%

Did not submit or incompletely depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Insufficiently depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Insufficiently provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Partially depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Partially provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Satisfactorily depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Satisfactorily provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Thoroughly depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Thoroughly provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system.
3. Expose two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Insufficiently exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Partially exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Satisfactorily exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Thoroughly exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.
4. Provide one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Provide justification for the recommendations.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for the recommendations. Insufficiently provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Insufficiently provided justification for the recommendations. Partially provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Partially provided justification for the recommendations. Satisfactorily provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Satisfactorily provided justification for the recommendations. Thoroughly provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Thoroughly provided justification for the recommendations.

 

Determine if it would make more sense to open the new business you describe or to purchase the existing business you selected.

2 papers

1.Select a small business that you visit often (e.g., coffee shop, bookstore, sporting goods store, etc.). Write a 6-8 page paper in which you:

 

1.       Craft a brief (1-2 pages) strategy for a business concept that would directly compete with the small business you selected. Explain the rationale for the strategy in detail.

 

2.       Determine if it would make more sense to open the new business you describe or to purchase the existing business you selected. Explain your reasoning.

 

3.       Discuss the most appropriate form of ownership for your new business (assuming your current financial situation).

 

4.       Outline a business plan for your business. Visit http://www.sba.gov for tools and templates.

 

5.       Include at least two (2) references outside the textbook.

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

·         Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

 

·         Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

 

 

 

 

 

2. Referring to the same business you either started or purchased in the first assignment, write a 6-8 page paper in which you:

 

Outline a financial plan for your small business. Develop a guerrilla marketing strategy for your small business. Discuss the most appropriate location for a second store (an actual street address). Explain your reasoning. Outline a plan for securing sources of debt financing for your second store. Include at least two (2) references outside the textbook.

 

 

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page leng

Identify and describe current business trends, issues, and opportunities, and their applicability to your organization.

HR Homework

For this assignment, review and describe the nine competency domains listed in the “HR Competency Model Unveiled” article linked in the Resources. Use the Capella University Library to research current business trends, issues, and opportunities in human capital management that are relevant for your organization and industry. If you are not currently employed at an organization, select a similar one about which you will be able to find sufficient information in order to complete this assignment. You might also use an organization where you were formerly employed.

In a 2–3-page paper, complete the following:

  • Describe the role of the HRM professional in human capital management.
  • Describe the SHRM HR Competency Model.
  • Identify and describe current business trends, issues, and opportunities, and their applicability to your organization.
  • Describe how you would use the SHRM HR Competency Model to respond to the business trends, issues, and opportunities identified.
  • Assess yourself as an HRM professional against the SHRM HR Competency Model.

Format your paper according to APA standards, including the following:

  • A title page.
  • An abstract.
  • Proper page margins, spacing, and page numbers.
  • Appropriate headings and subheadings.
  • Citations.