Author: Custom Essay

Please write a research paper about Crisis handling, the European Debt Crisis: . Spain, the condition before and after the crisis in Spain and causes of it . the effect on European countries. please do the following 1. vary the resources using different journals , books ,essays and other research paper cornering that matter with only maximum 10 resources no more than 10 . 2.write between 10,000 word up to 12000 word in 15 to 20 page.3. identify

Please write a research paper about Crisis handling, the European Debt Crisis:. Spain, the condition before and after the crisis in Spain and causes of it . the effect on European countries. please vary the resources using different journals , books ,essays and other research paper cornering that matter with only maximum 10 resources no more than 10 . Please write between 10,000 word up to 12000 word in 15 to 20 page. 3. identify (write ) aim and objective of research 4.make an abstract and acknowledgement and table of content .

Prepare a report on Cardinal Health or another Publicly Traded Healthcare Corporation, analyzing trends in its worthiness using the last 3 annual reports. This report should mostly include financial analysis but Please include a small amount of non-financial information. Please indicate whether the company is becoming more or less worth as an investment (consider both equity and debt investments).

CW 1: 100% weighting Learning Outcome: 1 ,2 and 3
Students will compare and contrast tourism policy and planning in two
destinations and create a portfolio of 4,000 words evidencing the different
approaches and opportunities for dissemination of best practice between
two destinations
Formative Assessment: Students will make their draft portfolios
available to the module leader who will provide regular feedback on the
progress and processes undertaken.

70 – 79 Demonstrates very good coherence of ideas and a very good knowledge and understanding of key concepts at an intermediate level. There is a good understanding of the subject matter and a fair degree of evidence of extensive wider reading some of which is from primary sources. There is a good level of critical analysis of issues and/or problems and the work shows some appreciation of competing perspectives. There is a very good appreciation of how knowledge is applied to real life contexts and a little understanding of where applied knowledge gaps exist. There is a very good ability to evaluate knowledge and to recognise the quality of third party evaluations. The work is communicated with some authority and referencing is accurate, apart from minor errors.
Let’s take each of the highlighted points in turn.
Key (planning) concepts Here is where you’ll bring in some definitions – sustainability, carrying capacity, corporate social responsibility, stakeholder theory, localism, planning goals, pollution, human rights, etc. This is not an exhaustive list but some examples. A little about the history of the phrase (and mind-set) Think Global Act Local in relation to the Brundtland report but please do not use web references! We want you to be reading texts but more of this below. Introduce the ‘Triple Bottom Line’. Some historical background may be relevant here but not too much.
Extensive wider reading What I am looking for here is wider reading about planning examples and comment from the texts but more the academic journals; planning and management of which there are dozens. Many are on-line but they will be accessed via UDo. As a rule of thumb, if you don’t need to access to a journal via UDo, it is probably not an academic journal. I have given several journals for you to read – please use them.
Critical analysis I have said this before, you can’t critically analyse a single author. What does Swarbrooke say about sustainability? How does that differ from Gunn’s view? How is theory interpreted within the case studies you read about in journal articles. Perhaps you are seeing the recurring theme here! The ‘triple bottom line’. Why do neither Hall nor Gunn mention this phrase although repeatedly refer to it?
Competing perspectives. It is likely you will find these in the tensions between the elements of triple bottom line! In the news there will be local disputes, as occurred in the village of Barwell, Leicestershire; a widespread phenomenon across the UK. Local councils agreed that planning consent should be given and the resultant fallout from that. (Some) local people oppose this (NIMBYs?) whilst the council feel it will bring economic growth. Local people say the green land the new houses will be built on is wrong. The council say the community desperately wants better services – this investment will fund them.
Real life contexts Look at almost any case study and identify the elements of sustainability. Look at the case study of Skyrail in Australia for instance. Look at the development of the Derby Arm. Look at HS2. Look at the Dome. Look at …… you don’t need to go far. Application of the theory into practice. What has been done, what should be done?
Quality of third party evaluations. Back to the academic journals here. Triangulation of the data. Would expect you to have been aware of this by now.
Some authority. This relates to your style and ability to reinforce your comment with academic referencing. That’s it! I am looking for you not to make statements that have no academic underpinning. We call it ‘under-girthing’ your comment. Please do not write something that prompts the reader to ask ‘who says?’
So now you must go back to the learning outcomes and ask if you have considered the trends. Where is planning going? Will there be less consultation with stakeholders or more? Think back to the Planning Officer’s visit? How widespread is that viewpoint outside the National Park. Remember we are to take a global approach but to what extent is in step with global consensus. Is there any global consensus? Probably the most challenging area is predicting growth trends but at least say how difficult this is to predict and why.
It is suggested you perhaps choose a case study to compare and contrast for this assessment and refer the decisions already made in the process, back to the literature (that is to say the theory that can be identified). For instance, if you find the developers have engaged with the local community, link that back to stakeholder theory. During the lectures, several journal articles about scenario planning, carrying capacities and de-marketing will be discussed. Perhaps you can find some reference to these issues within the case study.

In preparing your portfolio you may wish to include a formal report:

You may wish to add personal reflections from key informants in the form of a weblog or dialogue.

It would be advantageous to include policy references as hyperlinked internet resources. There is no need to append an entire website or contents to your portfolio but refer to the key planning legislation and policy documents to demonstrate your understanding and application of policy to the portfolio. These should be referenced using the Harvard format.

Formative Assessment: Students will make their draft portfolios available to the module leader who will provide regular feedback on the progress and processes undertaken.

Higher grades will be awarded as follows:
• evidence of wider research rather than just the content of the class discussion
by seeking influences of other industries and factors;
• higher level of critical analysis and debate, (contrasting the views of different authors)
• accurate grammar, spelling and appropriate structure;
• links to theoretical frameworks that are properly cited and referenced;
• application of theory to practice and provision of examples/ best practice models;
• use of contemporary sources to justify recommendations and conclusions

NOTICE: i have already done the proposal and this is the proposal.
To achieve future sustainability in the tourism industry, it is highly necessary that effective and efficient policies and planning be realized today. The planners and policy makers must be sensitive to identify the emerging trends in tourism and facilitate and maintain orderly growth and quality that updates the expectations of tourists and visitors. Tourism policies include progressive course of actions, guidelines, directives, principles, and procedures set in ethically that is issues-focused and best represents the intent of a country to effectively meet its planning, development, product, service, marketing, and sustainability goals and objectives for the future growth of tourism (Swarbrook & Horner, 2012).
In Dubai, international tourism has been adopted by the Dubai authorities as a core element of economic diversification programme. Tourism is overseen by the former crown prince who is also in charge of the Department of Tourism and Commerce Marketing. The department has a vision, and is already realizing it, of making Dubai the leading tourism destination and commercial hub over the world. The department’s mission involves tourism sustainability and economic growth, industry partnerships, innovation in promotion, unique experiences for visitors by ensuring quality service and value of money. The department oversees planning, supervision and development in the emirate. To underline the importance of tourism, the chairman of the Department is his Highness Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, vice president and prime minister of the UAE and ruler of Dubai. Dubai constantly markets itself and plans ahead such that tourists will get even more than their expectation with the government giving full support to the tourism industry (Swarbrook& Horner, 2012).
On the other hand, Paris is also one of the most attractive tourist destinations in the world. However it is not as appealing as Dubai as Dubai has taken the world by storm. This owes to the planning and policies that govern the management of tourism in the two nations. In Paris the tourism industry is not taken as serious as it in Dubai with the government letting the department of tourism to run in isolation as opposed to Dubai where the government is fully involved and controls and funds every plan and policy in the department. In addition, Paris does not open its tourist destinations all through. For instance on Sundays, it is hard to trace an open popular tourist spot unlike in Dubai where every day is a business day. The language, French, which Paris has so much held to also does not attract much of tourism and language serves a barrier to communication which is paramount for tourism unlike in Dubai where a much universal English language is spoken. Also in Dubai, security is no much ado unlike din Paris where there are many pickpockets especially in the high seasons (Swarbrook & Horner, 2012).

Using a spreadsheet format, create a data set of 10 patients as a master patient log, which includes the following:
Patient Name
Date of Admission
Admitting Diagnosis
Admitting Physician
Date of Discharge
Unique Identification Number
Describe how such a data set would be useful to a health care organization. THEN:
Review and assess the different functions between hardware and software used in health information systems.
THEN BRIEFLY: Discuss the fundamental elements of health information systems and how information might be exchanged between providers and other entities.

Sources should include: Gartee, R (2011). �Health Information Technology and Management�, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (text book)

Please adhere to APA formatting. Thank you!

Imagine that you are a senior consultant at Practical Health Care Consulting firm. Your supervisor has instructed you to spend three (3) months at the Caring Angel Hospital to help improve the quality of care, add value to the organization, improve employee morale, design an efficient organizational chart, create a strong team environment, and create the hospital�s competitive advantage. The hospital has traditionally made losses year after year. Furthermore, it is not performing well financially, and the banks are not willing to lend it large sums of money for more effective marketing.

After spending two (2) months within the hospital, you are very happy with your progress, and you think you are capable of acquiring more patient base and expanding the hospital market. However, with a closer look, you notice that your patients are still hopping from one specialized hospital to another in search of various specialized treatments. You also notice that the seats are not comfortable in the waiting area, and the patients continuously show up for appointments on the wrong dates. The nurses and the employees are not smiling during patient conversations, and everyone looks for ways to blame others for failures in the patient treatment process. Everyone seems to work alone and hide what they do from their colleagues.

At the end of the three (3) month period, you must provide a report with your recommended strategies designed to help Caring Angel Hospital achieve its goals.

Note: You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

From a consulting perspective, propose the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to achieve each of the following goals:
Improve the quality of care
Add value to the organization
Improve employee morale
Design an efficient organizational chart
Create a strong team environment
Create the hospital’s competitive edge.
Recommend one (1) approach that the hospital could use for acquiring a larger market share given the prevailing financial circumstances. Justify your recommendation.
Investigate at least two (2) value-added services that Caring Angel Hospital could offer to strengthen its value proposition. Provide at least two (2) examples of the advantages of these value-added services to the hospital.
Use four (4) recent (within the last five [5] years) quality academic resources in this assignment.
Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as quality academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student�s name, the professor�s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Propose methodologies that have been proven to increase value in health care delivery systems.
Examine leadership and management frameworks that are most applicable to a certain organization type within the health care industry.
Assess how politics in a health care organization motivates and demotivates employees, and recommend strategies to mitigate the challenges presented with each aspect.
Create a communication strategy to address an ethical dilemma within a health care organization regarding the quality of service and cost.
Craft a strategic plan that leads to a competitive advantage within a certain market.
Determine best practices for establishing and maintaining strategic alliances within the health care industry or enterprise.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in health care management.
Write clearly and concisely about health care management using proper writing mechanics.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Click here to view the grading rubric.

To prepare for this Discussion:
• Review the following articles: “The Legislative Process,” “Legislative Process: How a Senate Bill Becomes Law,” and “Ben’s Guide to U.S. Government.” Reflect on how laws are passed.
• Review the interactive media “Public Health Policy Process.”
• Research your federal and state legislative processes. For those of you who reside outside the United States, focus on your local and territorial legislative process.
• Select a law addressing a public health issue that was passed in your state. For those of you who reside outside the United States, select a law passed at the local or territorial level. Think about the process of how your selected law was passed.
• Consider the potential impact of your selected law on future national laws.
• Identify your federal and state representatives. For those of you who reside outside the U.S., identify your local and territorial officials.

With these thoughts in mind:
Post a description of the law you selected, and explain in detail the process of how it became a law within your state or territory. Then, describe the potential impact of your selected law on future national laws. Make sure to identify your federal, state, and/or territorial representatives/officials.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the

Learning Resources.
Required Resources

Two parts of this project are required. 1. One-page long report to explain the documentation and answer the questions below. 2. Java documentation.

Late delivery of either the report or the code will cause the refund.

https://stp.lingfil.uu.se/~matsd/uv/uv14/nlp/wsdnlp.html

First, make sure you understand: What is the problem of Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD)? Why is it important from a language technology engineering point of view? How is it a classification problem? How do you use SVM learning and classification to solve classification problems generally and in this WSD case? (No detailed understanding of the internal mechanisms of SVM:s and SVM learning algorithms is required.) What is an n-fold cross validation? How do you compute the precision, recall and F1 scores? And what do they show?
The course literature, the links given here, and other net resources give plenty of useful information about the matters important to this assignment.
A Java implementation for WSD experiments provides the point of departure for the assignment [package wsd (tar), doc].
The sense keys are from WordNet and you can see how they are explained there. Classification applies to tokens belonging to a certain lemma, defined by the lemma and pos attributes, and is binary, predicting that a token has a certain sense (defined by a WordNet sense key) or that it doesn’t have that sense (has another sense).
You (and the Java implementation) will use the following resources (placed as specified in theFileLocations class fields, which you’re expected to modify according to your own preferences):
Data: The largest publicly available sense-tagged corpus: semcor3.0. (Download semcor3.0.) Put the semcor3.0 contents in the FileLocations.semCorLoc directory. (This is already done for our own linux system.)
We’ll use Thorsten Joachims’ SVMlight implementation of SVM learning (svm_learn) and classification (svm_classify). (Other SVM implementations can be used, of course.) Put the two programmes in the FileLocations.progLoc directory. (This is already done for our own linux system.)
We’ll use the classification tasks in the following text file for our experiments:senseDistinctions.txt. It lists those senses which have at least 100 positive instances, and which applies to between 40 and 60 percent of all the instances of that lemma. The 32 entries are like “add VB 2:30:00::”, i.e. lemma, pos tag, and sense key separated by blanks. PutsenseDistinctions.txt in the FileLocations.wsdData directory.
The FileLocations.wsdData directory should have the subdirectories examples, model, and predictions, in which input and output from SVMlight will reside.
The code is compiled and executed in this way on our Linux system when you stand in the srcdirectory (but you might want to use som other environment):
javac se/uu/lingfil/stp/wsd/*.*
java se.uu.lingfil.stp.wsd.Main
To describe the experiment briefly, it performs WSD SVM training and classification on each of the sense distinctions in “senseDistinctions.txt”. First, the example data are extracted from the SemCor corpus, i.e. positive and negative instances are located and features extracted. After that, training and validation sets are created for a 10-fold crossvalidation. They are used for SVM training and classification.
The Main.main method runs the experiment and reports precision, recall and F1 score for each sense distinction crossvalidation experiment and also averages of these outcome scores. This is an example of this: output.
The Java code that is provided gives us the following:
The ten-fold crossvalidation setup is for each sense distinction based on all available instances (i.e. the training set sizes vary). It computes precision, recall and F1 score for each sense distinction crossvalidation experiment.
An extremely parsimonious feature extraction class – FeatureExtractorLetterLeft – is provided. It only extracts the letter immediately to the left as a feature for a token.FeatureExtractorPosLetterLeft in addition extracts the pos tag for the token immediately to the left. (Of course, a lot of useful information escapes these schemes.) FeatureExtractorLetterLeftgives this result. As the result depends on a random partitioning of the data into ten folds, each run will give slightly different results.
The assignment consists in doing the following:
Evaluation may also be based on training sets of equal size. Overall evaluation metrics may also be based on the totality of token level outcomes. Contrast these evaluation choices with the ones made in the existing implementation! Which evaluation metrics are most interesting (in what context)? Furthermore, modify the implementation to allow evaluation metrics to be computed also in these ways.
Try to find and implement the best pos-tag-based collocational (pos at a certain relative position) feature extraction scheme.
Try to find and implement a better collocational (something at a certain relative position) feature extraction scheme.
In relation to the these extractions schemes, are there any sense distinctions that are unusually easy or difficult to predict? Is it possible to explain this with the help of a linguistics-based analysis of what is reasonable to expect from behaviour of the lemma?
Try to find and implement the best bag-of-lemmas and bag-of-word-forms feature extraction scheme and compare the two.
Grading
In order to pass this assignment, you will need to: submit solutions to all points above, document them, and support your conclusions in a way that shows that you understand the empirical methods being used.

Topics:
TOPIC 1: The Tang-Song Transformation
The Song dynasty, despite its military losses to the nomadic regimes in the north, marked a new era in Chinese history characterized by profound political, economic, social and cultural changes. These include the rise of scholars’ status, expansion of civil-service examinations, rising prominence of Neo-Confucianism, re-definition of gendered space, thriving artistic and literary achievements, and an affluent urban culture. Write an essay elaborating at least three of the above-mentioned aspects to illustrate the unique developments during the Tang-Song Transformation.

TOPIC 2: The Encounter of Late Imperial China with the Outside World
During the Ming and Qing periods, government policies towards foreign religions, trade requests, and cultural practices oscillated between curiosity and rejection. Choose at least three examples to discuss what “foreigners” or “foreignness” would have meant to the Chinese during this period.

Instructions:
Write an essay of at least 1000 words in response to each of the two topics listed above. Remember that this is an exercise in synthesis and argument. You must have a clearly identifiable thesis statement that forms the basis of your essay.
Note that you need to think about the course as a whole and to draw evidence from lectures and readings to support your argument. You will not pass this assignment if, for example, all your examples are drawn from only one reading. This is the most significant dimension of the take-home exam.
Consult the Chicago Manual of Style or MLA style for citation formats:
https://sass.uottawa.ca/en/writing/resources/references
Also note that quoting another person’s words and ideas from the Internet or paper-based sources without acknowledgement constitutes plagiarism, which is ground for failure and possible suspension.

Task: Your task is to identify a Serious Case Review to analyse in respect of environmental safeguarding issues. Environmental safeguarding issues relate to the workplace context. Some examples may include: problems with management and communication; a culture of silence and lack of whistleblowing routes; staff failing to identify safeguarding concerns, etc. There are key elements that should be a part of your assignment:

1) You must provide a brief background of the case and the issues involved;

2) You should move beyond description and critically analyse the issues with reference to the literature in this field;

3) You should make recommendations for practice, on the basis of your critical assessment of the case.
The issues you identify in SCRs should be analysed with reference to the literature, referring to unit materials but you are also expected to read farther and wider and draw on materials that have not been provided to you on the reading list. Your reading list is merely a starting point.
Structure: Your SCR should include an introduction that includes your aim of the assignment; a background providing an overview of the case and the key issues involved; the main body of the assessment critically analysing the SCR and a conclusion drawing out the key messages and recommendations for future practice.

Annotated Bibliography

The purpose of the annotated bibliography is to assist you in developing research analysis skills including critical thinking, writing, and literature research skills. The annotated bibliography should include a paragraph for each source containing the following information:

Name of the article, including the complete bibliographic citation, using APA format.
Summary/abstract of the article – annotation (sometimes it is helpful to ask yourself the following questions in synthesizing the information:
Who? (author)
What was done? (e.g., an experimental study investigating the interaction of short term memory and attention)
How? (was it done)
What were the findings? (identify the major ones)
Contributions? (new findings, applications, etc.)

Review the complete instructions for the Final Paper in Week Five. To conduct accurate research for the annotated bibliography, consider the following:

Research in peer-reviewed journals or other journals that are considered to have reliable information (do not use sources from the secular press (e.g., Time, Newsweek, or Wikipedia). Review the guidelines for acceptable sources by reading the “Academic Research” section within the Student Responsibilities and Policies tab under Course Home on the left navigation toolbar in your online course.
Identify at least ten academic sources at least six of which can be found in the Ashford Online Library. If you do find something on the World Wide Web, it must be authored and be a reliable source.
In these journals, the research and information is either reviewed by an editorial team (such as for the Academy of Management Review) or a group of peers (such as in many journals you find through the Ashford Online Library).
You must use at least ten scholarly sources (at least six of which can be found in the Ashford Online Library) other than the textbook. The descriptions for each source must be at least one paragraph in length. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar.