5 page turabian style journal article review for

Nuclear Deterrence and Cyber:

The Quest for Concept

Dr. Stephen J. Cimbala

http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/article.asp?id=190

journal article is an evaluation of the article’s strengths, weaknesses, and validity. It is used to inform of the article’s value through your explanation, interpretation, and analysis. As you do this, ask the major questions that are central to the review process:

1. What is the purpose of this article?

2. Why is it important to investigate or examine the subject of the article?

3. How are the authors carrying out the task? Are their methods and comments appropriate and adequate to the task?

4. What do they claim to have found out? Are the findings clearly stated?

5. How does this advance knowledge in the field?

title and refrence page not included in page count

Use the CSU Online Library to locate and review a scholarly article found in a peer reviewed journal related to analyzing work, designing jobs, HR planning, or recruiting. In peer reviewed journals, the articles were reviewed by other professionals in the field to ensure the accuracy and quality of the article, which is ideal when writing an Article Critique. Research Tip: When researching using the databases, you can limit your search to only peer reviewed articles. To do this, look for the phrase “limit results,” and select “peer reviewed articles.” Once you have selected your article, follow the below criteria: There is a minimum requirement of 500 words for the article critique.  Write a summary of the article. This should be one to three paragraphs in length, depending on the length of the article. Include the purpose for the article, how research was conducted, the results, and other pertinent information from the article. Discuss the meaning or implication of the results of the study that the article covers. This should be one to two paragraphs. This is where you offer your opinion on the article. Discuss any flaws with the article, how you think it could have been better, and what you think it all means.  Write one paragraph discussing how the author could expand on the results, what the information means in the big picture, what future research should focus on, or how future research could move the topic forward. Discuss how knowledge in the area could be expanded. Cite any direct quotes or paraphrases from the article. Use the author’s name, the year of publication and the page number (for quotes) in the in-text citation. Use APA format.

This is your third (and final) essay project of the semester.

Your essay will analyze the artistic agenda of the Surrealists—an early 20th-century group of artists who created fantastical, bizarre, and irrational works of art.

• Your essay must be at least 500-words long.
• You must use a word processing program (such as MS Word) to write your essay.
• You must then submit/attach your essay to the assignment page as a DOC, DOCX, or PDF file.
• To submit/attach your essay to the assignment page, you must click “Attach File” under the “Assignment Submission” section.
• The grading rubric for this essay can be found in the “Rubrics” folder under the “Resources” button.

Topic/Title—“In Dreams: Surrealism and the Human Condition”

The 20th century bore witness to the emergence of a trend towards art that explored the human condition—art that explored human psychology with bizarre, irrational, and nonsensical ideas and images.  Such ideas and images are usually associated with our dreams and nightmares (our subconscious experiences).  You will write an essay on this trend.  To do so, you must follow these criteria:

Focus your attention on the Surrealists—an early 20th-century group of artists who created fantastical, bizarre, and irrational art.  You must explain Surrealism’s artistic agenda and pay particular attention to what the Surrealists intended to say with their art.  You must also explain why the strange works of art produced by the Surrealists were timely—what they said about culture and society during the early 20th century.  Do not forget to cite specific artists and their works of art.  You cannot successfully write about this topic unless you do so.

https://online.ivytech.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-27338176-dt-content-rid-65969710_1/xid-65969710_1

In this discussion, please reflect on your comprehension of financial management and knowledge gained from the media concerning financial real world activities and events occurring in the US.

• What actions and behaviors of leaders and managers in corporations could influence the market value and price of stocks?
• In reflecting on the creation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to increase accountability through new mandatory standards, what are some possible explanations as to why unethical conduct occurs in financial management?
• What are some activities corporations can do to decrease overall unethical practices and promote good business ethics in the organization?

Must follow instructions exactly as described also must review grading rubric before starting which will be provided. Must be willing to send preview two days prior to due date. 

Overview

For this essay, you will need to interview a person who experienced one of the historical events listed below. From your interview, you will write an analytical essay to relate the interview and its historical context.

Instructions

Follow these instructions to complete your essay:

1. Choose an individual to collect an oral history of their experiences of one or more of the historical events listed below (remember, these can overlap depending on the time). This individual can be a family member, a friend, a community member, an educator or anyone else who lived through or has direct knowledge about this selected time and its legacies:
   1. Living under Jim Crow
   2. The Great Migration
   3. The Civil Rights Movement
2. Follow these guidelines when collecting your oral history:
   1. Be clear in your own mind what you want to find out.
      • Only conduct your interview after you have completed the associated learning module so you know a little more about your subject of inquiry. Bring along or share other sources of information that you have, such as news clippings, photographs, or course readings. Also, ask your source to bring anything they can share with you, such as a scrapbook, a photo album, or other important media. These materials can help spark memories or deepen the conversation.
   2. Acquire Informed Consent.
      • Please make sure you explain to the interviewee prior to the conversation the purpose of the interview, what you hope to accomplish, and that you will only use what is spoken about for the oral history essay you have been assigned for class. Tell them why you selected them and what you hope to find out. Then explicitly as for their verbal permission or consent to undertake the interview. You are required to keep the conversation anonymous and not share any of the information to anyone other than your instructor via your essay. If you choose to use a tape recorder, you must ask for permission to record the conversation and once you have used the data obtained from the recording, you must destroy the content of the recording. Again, you are only allowed to use this information for the purposes of this class assignment.
   3. Create a list of questions to use as a guide.
      • Use open-ended questions rather than general questions that can only be answered by “yes” or “no”. For example, “What are some of the things that you can remember happening to you at school?” NOT “Do you remember what happened to you this school year?” These questions are meant to help prompt your source to begin discussing their experiences.
   4. You do not have to follow your list exactly.
      • Undertaking a semi-structured interview means that you only use your list of questions as a guide. Anticipate that the conversation will flow organically out of these questions, but may go in a different direction than you originally intended. It is important that you learn from the information being conveyed to you so some interesting items will emerge that you might not have thought to ask about. Of course, if the conversation gets seriously off topic, then you can bring it back using another question on your list.
   5. You do not have to write everything that is said.
      • It is important not to distract yourself with writing down every word that the interviewee says, but rather to take short notes to remind yourself about what was said after the interview is over. Sit down and write out what the person said as soon after the interview as possible. Remember to also right notes about your own impressions, feelings, and reflections about what was said. If you have access to a tape recorder you can use it during the interview and transcribe what was said later, again not necessarily transcribing each and every word that was said, but point to things that made an impression on you.
3. Write an analytical essay about your oral history. Your essay must include all of the following components, in no particular order:
   1. In Module Two, Paul E. Lovejoy introduces us to the importance of methodology in the consideration of African American histories.
      1. You must provide the context for your interview by framing the historical period/moment in your own words, drawing from your knowledge gained in the course. Please cite all sources used.
      2. Position your oral history as a text that contributes to the production of knowledge within African American Studies. What do oral histories offer us as we attempt to redress the silence of African American experiences within the dominant canon of U.S. history? How can oral histories be viewed as a “revisionist” approach to the historical study of Jim Crow, the Great Migration, and/or the Civil Rights Movement?
      3. What are some methodological considerations that you must attend to in writing an oral history? Do you focus on demographic details in determining the why, when, and how of individual lives? Do you focus on geography and the spatial aspects of social relationships? To what extent might you weave into the story biographical accounts? A sociological analysis of the process by which individuals formed new communities and new identities? How might you “unpack” the use of categories and labels “in context”? How might you manage the problem of chronology and time? (Please review Lovejoy’s discussion and Chapter Two lecture presentation, as well as the WPA Slave Narratives readings).
   2. You must then share the selected parts of your oral history that stood out or made an impression on you. Tell us a bit about your interviewee and the experience s/he shared with you. What new information did you learn? How has your understanding of the topic deepened? Be specific.
      1. Use Chapter Three of CG Fleming’s Soon We Will Not Cry as a model for how to write from an oral history. You must analyze the information gained through applying concepts, ideas, and arguments encountered in the course.
      2. Reflect upon what you learned from undertaking an oral history? Why do you think oral histories are important to your understanding of the topic at hand? What did you learn that no academic reading could teach you?
   3. To what extent does your oral history help to correct the largely absent “herstory” of African American Studies? Beverly Guy-Sheftal urges “a new angle of vision” and “new questions” to be asked when taking a black feminist approach to African American Studies. What new questions might offset the dominant conceptual frameworks that have been shaped by a “hegemonic black nationalist discourse” that conceptualizes black liberation as heavily focused on “recuperating black manhood, constructing patriarchal families, and ending racism,” while at the same time silencing other intersecting forms of oppression (gender, class, sexuality)? Can you provide an analysis for how gender, race, and class intersect in the experience of your interviewee?
   4. Please attach a bibliography and your list of questions as an appendix to your final essay (Note: not included in the 7 page minimum).
4. Format your essay according to these guidelines:
   • Length: 5-7 pages
   • Line spacing: double-spaced
   • Font: 12-point Times New Roman
   • Margins: 1-inch
   • Footer and/or header: include your name and page numbers
   • Bibliography: follow the APA Formatting and Style Guide; this is not included in the page minimum.
   • File format: .doc or .docx
   • File name: “yourname_essay2”

Prepare formal documentation of the code:

Must be at minimum 2 pages and explain the code of these 2 programs.

Expectations:

This guide will explain the design and structure of the program itself. Describe how it works on an internal level. This is a guide a programmer might use, so you want to consider the use cases that relate to a programmer. What if a programmer wanted to add a new command? How about a new program operation? etc.. The information contained within should give a programmer a good idea of which parts of the program provide specific functionality, and how that functionality is implemented. You don’t want to go down to the level of describing the code itself in words, but you do want to describe any important algorithms in detail, and at least generalize how things work. The overall guidance here is to leave out details about how to run or use the program, and just talk about how the program actually does its job.

Final Paper

Construct a Hoosier Burger case analysis paper using your weekly analyses. The paper should represent the research and recommendations you have created for Hoosier Burger over the last four weeks in a cohesive format. Your paper should demonstrate critical thought. The paper should be 10-12 double-spaced pages, excluding the title and reference pages. The structure of the paper should be as follows:

1. Cover Page
   • Title of paper
   • Student’s name
   • Course name and number
   • Instructor’s name
   • Date submitted
2. Introduction

   The introduction should familiarize the reader with the project and outline the major points that you will cover in the paper. It should include your thesis statement. If you need assistance with writing a thesis statement, visit the Ashford Writing Center’s website for help.

3. Body

   Make the suggested changes to the assignments for Weeks One through Four based on the constructive feedback provided by your instructor Do not simply copy and paste your previous assignments into your final paper. Read your writing and improve upon what you have already written to connect everything learned in this class. Be sure that your paper addresses the following points.

   1. System Overview
      1. Apply all four parts of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) approach to Hoosier Burger.
      2. Using the Hoosier Burger scenario, discuss at least one example of each of the nine system characteristics listed on pages 6-7.
      3. Provide an explanation of all Hoosier Burger’s major subsystems.
      4. Explain which of the four approaches to system development found on pages 20-24 you believe should be used by Hoosier Burger. Support your explanation with examples from your own experiences and/or scholarly sources.
   2. Scope and Feasibility
      5. Explain how the Hoosier Burger project was identified and selected. Discuss the focus that the new system should have.
      6. Explain the Hoosier Burger project’s scope.
      7. Assess the Hoosier Burger project’s feasibility by using the six categories of feasibility factors listed on page 100.
      8. Using Figure 4-13 as a guide, develop a Project Scope Statement for the Hoosier Burger project. Include the following categories in the statement: General Project Information, Problem/Opportunity Statement, Project Objectives, Project Description, Business Benefits, Project Deliverables, and Estimated Project Duration.
   3. Requirements Determination
      9. Create a customer satisfaction questionnaire that includes at least five well-written questions. Explain your rationale for the style in which you wrote the questions.
      10. Create a waiter questionnaire that includes at least five well-written questions. Explain your rationale for the style in which you wrote the questions.
      11. Discuss the types of documents you are likely to obtain for further study as well as the types of documents that most likely will not be available. Discuss the types of documents that would be useful to analyze for requirements gathering purposes and why they would be important. Additionally, discuss which documents would be possible to obtain and why as well as which ones would be difficult to obtain and why.
      12. Identify which modern requirements determination methods would be appropriate for this project and explain why you think they would be suitable.
   4. Diagrams
      13. Modify the Hoosier Burger context-level data-flow diagram (Figure 6-4) to reflect the changes mentioned in the case. Explain the changes you made and why you made the changes.
      14. Modify Hoosier Burger’s level-0 diagram (Figure 6-5) to reflect the changes mentioned in the case. Explain the changes you made and why you made the changes.
      15. Prepare level-1 diagrams to reflect the changes mentioned in the case. Explain why you designed the diagrams the way you did.
   5. Data Modeling

      Read the Hoosier Burger scenario on page 242 in Chapter 7 of the text.

      16. Based on the information provided in the case scenario, identify the entities for which Hoosier Burger will need to store information.
      17. Identify a set of attributes for each entity listed in part a.
      18. Specify an identifier for each entity and explain the rules you applied when you selected the identifier.
      19. Modify Figure 7-11 to reflect the addition of these new entities. Be sure to specify the cardinalities for each relationship.

      To ensure readability, supply headings for each section of the body.

4. Conclusion

   In your conclusion, restate your thesis statement. Review your conclusions. Include any ideas you have about the project that you did not already discuss.

5. References

   Provide an APA-formatted reference list. In addition to the text, cite at least four additional scholarly references from the Ashford library to support your discussion.

   Be sure your paper is formatted according to APA style guidelines.

   Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.