The paper will need to include 5 pages of written text (standard Word file with 1.5 line spacing or equivalent to 5 pages of text formatted to Helvetica Regular, 12 point type with 18 point leading, 1 inch margins – OR, approximately 2,500 words), and 5 pages of imagery on your chosen subject, for a total of ten pages. You will turn in a printed copy AND a digital file (Word, Pages or PDF file).
You will write your paper on one of the following designers:
David Carson, April Greiman, Margo Chase, Clement Mok, Joe Duffy Charles S. Anderson, Zuzana Licko/Rudy Vanderlans,
Stefan Sagmeister, Chip Kidd, Matthew Carter, Neville Brody, Milton Glaser, Saul Bass, Joshua Davis
Peter Saville, Jan Tschichold, Paul Rand, Alexey Brodovitch, Alvin Lustig Herbert Matter, Georg Olden

Your paper should have both biographical information and information about their design work/careers. Also, tell me why you chose this designer – what is it about their work or them as a person that appeals to you? What can you learn from them that you can use in your career as a designer

Discussion 6 Formal Critique

This discussion assignment is a formal critique of one artwork of your choosing. You are to write a formal critique (300 word minimum) of one artwork. Pick either your favorite piece or one that interests you because of the image, subject matter or content. You don’t have to “like” the artwork you choose to critique. You can choose an artwork you don’t understand or one you may question why it is considered art.

Remember this is a visual arts course primarily dealing with fine art.

Choose an artwork that fits within those guidelines.

In addition to the formal critique, you are required to read other student’s critiques and post questions, comments and replies (4 student critiques minimum) throughout the week the discussion is available.

Read the art critique guide before you begin writing your artwork critique:

A Guide to Writing an Art Critique

(Click on the Art Critique link in the menu on the left side of your screen.)

Formal Art Critique Directions

Include the following 5 items in your Formal Art Critique submission:

1. Introduction (The Introduction is NOT included in the 300 word minimum.)

Artist Name, Artwork Title (in italic font), Year the Artwork was created,

Artwork Medium, Scale of the Artwork.

Example: Georgia O’Keeffe, Purple Hills Near Abiquiu, 1935, Oil on canvas,

16×30 in.

Include an image of the artwork in your post. Use the Picture icon not the Paper

Clip. Remember to click on the image and drag inward diagonally from the corner

to resize the image if it appears too large when inserted into the text page.

2. Description (Subject Matter)

What Do You See? Make a list of the things you see in the artwork.

Describe the Subject Matter; objects, shapes, colors. Be specific.

3. Formal Analysis

Formally Analyze the composition using art terms, paying attention to the

Elements (line, shape, form, space, color, value and texture) and Principles

of Art.

Make statements about the relations among the things you named in the

description (number 2). You should note similarities and dissimilarities

(compare and contrast) in formal elements–such things as color, shape, or

direction. Take note of continuities (such as the color red repeated throughout

the artwork) and of connections (for example, the shape of a window repeated in

the shape of a table) between these formal elements and the subject matter.

What kind of spatial devices are used to create dimensionality? Overlapping?

Aerial perspective? Do you see examples of repetition or rhythm? Finally,

note the overall qualities of the work.

Here are a few vocabulary words to help:

Balance Symmetry vs. Asymmetry

Use of negative space Dominance

Emphasis Movement

Rhythm Unity

Variety Complementary Colors

Analogous Colors Primary Colors

Warm Colors Cool Colors

Value Intensity

Monochromatic Polychromatic

4. Interpretation (Content)

What was the intent of the artist? Make statements about the meaning(s) of the

artwork. (the content) This is the most creative part of your critique. Using a

hypothesis, support it with arguments, based on evidence given in the description

and formal analysis. (numbers 2 and 3)

5. Judgment

Make a decision about the artwork. Did it accomplish what was intended? Why

or why not? This is the place for personal opinion. What you actually think about

the artwork. The good, the bad, and the ugly. Be honest and be specific. If you

think the artwork is a piece of crap, you must explain why you think it is a piece of

crap. Statements without facts to back them up are like profanity insults; shallow

and meaningless. Fact less statements reveal more about the person making

them than the person the statements were intended to insult.

Discussion 6 Formal Critique

This discussion assignment is a formal critique of one artwork of your choosing. You are to write a formal critique (300 word minimum) of one artwork. Pick either your favorite piece or one that interests you because of the image, subject matter or content. You don’t have to “like” the artwork you choose to critique. You can choose an artwork you don’t understand or one you may question why it is considered art.

Remember this is a visual arts course primarily dealing with fine art.

Choose an artwork that fits within those guidelines.

In addition to the formal critique, you are required to read other student’s critiques and post questions, comments and replies (4 student critiques minimum) throughout the week the discussion is available.

Read the art critique guide before you begin writing your artwork critique:

A Guide to Writing an Art Critique

(Click on the Art Critique link in the menu on the left side of your screen.)

Formal Art Critique Directions

Include the following 5 items in your Formal Art Critique submission:

1. Introduction (The Introduction is NOT included in the 300 word minimum.)

Artist Name, Artwork Title (in italic font), Year the Artwork was created,

Artwork Medium, Scale of the Artwork.

Example: Georgia O’Keeffe, Purple Hills Near Abiquiu, 1935, Oil on canvas,

16×30 in.

Include an image of the artwork in your post. Use the Picture icon not the Paper

Clip. Remember to click on the image and drag inward diagonally from the corner

to resize the image if it appears too large when inserted into the text page.

2. Description (Subject Matter)

What Do You See? Make a list of the things you see in the artwork.

Describe the Subject Matter; objects, shapes, colors. Be specific.

3. Formal Analysis

Formally Analyze the composition using art terms, paying attention to the

Elements (line, shape, form, space, color, value and texture) and Principles

of Art.

Make statements about the relations among the things you named in the

description (number 2). You should note similarities and dissimilarities

(compare and contrast) in formal elements–such things as color, shape, or

direction. Take note of continuities (such as the color red repeated throughout

the artwork) and of connections (for example, the shape of a window repeated in

the shape of a table) between these formal elements and the subject matter.

What kind of spatial devices are used to create dimensionality? Overlapping?

Aerial perspective? Do you see examples of repetition or rhythm? Finally,

note the overall qualities of the work.

Here are a few vocabulary words to help:

Balance Symmetry vs. Asymmetry

Use of negative space Dominance

Emphasis Movement

Rhythm Unity

Variety Complementary Colors

Analogous Colors Primary Colors

Warm Colors Cool Colors

Value Intensity

Monochromatic Polychromatic

4. Interpretation (Content)

What was the intent of the artist? Make statements about the meaning(s) of the

artwork. (the content) This is the most creative part of your critique. Using a

hypothesis, support it with arguments, based on evidence given in the description

and formal analysis. (numbers 2 and 3)

5. Judgment

Make a decision about the artwork. Did it accomplish what was intended? Why

or why not? This is the place for personal opinion. What you actually think about

the artwork. The good, the bad, and the ugly. Be honest and be specific. If you

think the artwork is a piece of crap, you must explain why you think it is a piece of

crap. Statements without facts to back them up are like profanity insults; shallow

and meaningless. Fact less statements reveal more about the person making

them than the person the statements were intended to insult.

This thesis is on the relation between visions and technology development

I have chose the case of New Silk Road vision of the United States in Afghanistan and how this relates to support building for TAPI pipeline project

I have written a literature review and collected sources (documents and interviews) that need to be analyzed and used in the thesis

The number of pages I have indicated are from introduction upto conclusions

Please see added files

My instruction:
write a 3 pages report of challenging to change a behavior. I want to change my health behavior by increase physical actives. I want to do cardio workout at least three times a week, and increase my physical actives everyday in my life.

My professor instruction:
Final Paper – Personal essay report of you experience with your 30 day challenge

The authors of our book designed an effective program for behavior change. They were nice enough to include the program in your text for absolutely no additional charge. This assignment allows you to use tools from their behavior change labs to address any KIN 175 related behavior. This could include working out, eating healthy food, drinking more water, meditating, quitting smoking, taking a break from drinking or getting high, or reducing anxiety or worrying. If you look through the topics we cover, you will get some ideas.The assignment will be to choose a behavior to change, fill out the forms posted in this assignment on WebCampus (WC), and write a 3-page report (check the due dates on WC). Whether or not you are ‘successful’ in your quest is not as important as your intent and effort.

Pricing

Essay #4 (“An Eye on Impressionism”)
Synthesis & Intro to Research

Synthesis: using two (or more) things to make a new claim. To do this, you analyze each work and try to make connections among the things. In synthesis, you come to your own unique conclusions based on your observations of and interpretation of multiple items such as different works of art or written works.

Observe the paintings of the Impressionist painters and decide your ideas on the following:
What is the subject matter of their work? (Who? Where? When/What time of the day?)
What are the formal qualities of the Impressionists? What kinds of materials or artistic media (e.g. oil paint, pastel, charcoal, clay, metal) did they use? How did they use them (i.e. techniques with paint)—how does that compare to previous styles (e.g. Renaissance, Romanticism)?
What seems to be the “focus” of their work? How are they setting themselves apart from other movements? Is there anything interesting about the compositions? What comparisons could you make to show the differences from past movements?
What do you know about how popular or well-known this art is today? How much are these pieces worth? Do you know how they were received at first? How do these paintings affect you? Why?

Since you are not experts on this topic, you will also be integrating research into your conclusions about the Impressionist art movement.

Your paper should:

Be typed with 1 inch margins, aligned-left, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12 point and MLA format with a correct header

-the paper:

Much has been make of the link of our diet with our health outcomes. But the transportation connection is sometimes overlooked as a critical
component, particularly for those with limited
means. How might transportation and land use planning address this issue? What are the limits
to how transportation policies might help? Is
this only a problem that impacts those with
transport disadvantage?

– Your final project or paper for the term should focus on a narrowly defined topic with a well-thought out research question or methodology that you wish to investigate. You are to research this question using a careful review of the academic and practical literature, empirical methods, and/or other appropriate
approaches throughout the term. The form of the finished project is up to you: students may choose a more traditional term paper or project but innovative projects, such as computer programs, websites, survey designs, applications, etc, are also welcome but must be pre-approved.

– most of the references should be from academic journals.

use assessment marking guide to flow with the charter in responding- or how to address the questions looking at those marks. It is below the course description paper but now you are looking at assignment one.

In defining the project you need to do it in three and half or so sentences.

Background of the organisation- 2 good paragraphs.

Expected outcomes: Do five smart objectives. When you get to the milestones…you are repeating the five objectives (Smart) and their due dates. Showing progress through the project-Matrix here. On the financial, i am attaching a separate document. What is in white stays the same…what is in yellow you can change-this is on the section of the financial analysis. The table is already done so you are estimating what is need for the project like initial cost etc etc. If you don’t understand let me know. Lets do distinction. Do in text ref where you feel it is reasonable remember this is a charter. Anyway when you read the assignment one…you will see all the requirements and pay attention to the marking guide. Answer the way the question is asked but read
Detailed marking criteria can be found in the Marking Guides section of this course description with other info which needs to be in the charter e.g risk analysis- what is major and what else…And go to that requirements to be addressed. I only want the writer with id 368510 to handle my project.

Research Paper

Introduction to Community and Population Health: HSHA 332
“A Community Health Approach”

Your textbook focuses on a variety of subjects that are recognized issues within communities, as well as the public in general. However, for this research project we will focus more on the community. Select a subject issue from the list provided below, and follow the road map.

Health of the elderly
Maternal, infant, and child health issues
Adolescents and young adults
Adult health issues
Mental health issues
Alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs
Environmental health and safety Racial and ethnic populations

Road map
Treat this road map as a guide. I do not expect that every item below pertains to your subject, but it’s designed to provide direction. With that said, the student is expected to use available information that is relevant to the subject matter at hand. Add additional information/items as necessary.

1. Briefly define your subject, and discuss how your subject is considered a community health issue.
a. How is it a problem?
b. Why is it a problem?
c. What population(s) are affected?
d. What health issues are involved?
• Health problems
• Health risks
• Diseases
• Mortality
• Various illnesses

2. Provide a detailed account of your subject’s history within the community. In other words, has it always been an issue within the community? At what point in time was it considered a community health issue?

3. From the list above, at a minimum, select two other subjects that have a direct affect on your particular subject. Discuss the interrelationship between your subject and the other subjects you have chosen. How are they linked?
a. Describe the direct impact and/or affect the other subjects have on your subject.
b. What is the direct impact and/or affect within the community?
c. What is its overall health impact within the community?

4. Health care.
a. What is the impact on the health care system?
b. Is there an issue with the delivery of health care?

5. Addressing the problem: community involvement, program development, and program implementation.
a. How will you organize the community regarding your health issue?
b. How will you get the community involved?
c. What program(s) will you put in place to address the issue(s)?
• What health education program(s) will you develop? Describe.
• What type of health promotion program(s) will you develop? Describe.
d. Is a disease prevention program applicable? Explain.
e. What about your interventions?

Things to Include:

1. In your discussion you are to provide statistics and data in support of your talking points (i.e., health outcomes, morbidity rates, mortality rates, etc.).

2. Your response should focus on certain demographics or population groups that are affected (i.e., children, adults, seniors, male or female, certain age groups, etc.), or you may provide an all-inclusive general discussion, singling-out a specific population where appropriate.

3. Keep in mind, the information on the first page should be used as a tool to help guide your discussion. It is up to you to determine the “what,” “where,” “why,” and “how,” regarding the subject matter you choose to discuss.

4. A minimum of three sources are required; the textbook can count as one. At least two identifiable sources will need to come from journals and other sources.

Hint: The “references” at the end of the chapters of your textbook, can be very valuable sources.

Grading: Among other things, your paper will be graded partially for its substance, the information used from the sources cited, and the quality of content in your paper.

Point Deductions: Among other things, points will be deducted for the following:
• Misspelled words, incorrect use of words, missing or incorrect use of commas (colons, semi-colons, apostrophes, etc.).

• Incorrect syntax (sentence structure).

• Obvious overuse of small paragraphs (as a means of taking-up space and filling-up the page), and obvious creation of space (as a means of taking-up space and filling-up the page).

• Ten (10) points will be deducted for every page not completed. Keep in mind, this paper is a required eight-page minimum. So, for example, if you only submit 6 pages, twenty (20) points will automatically be deducted; ten points for each missing page.

Paper Formatting & Submission Instructions

1. The paper must contain at least 8 full-length pages.

2. 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spaced text, and one-inch margins all around.

3. Include page numbers.

4. Adhere to a recognized writing style for formatting citations throughout the paper, and the bibliography.

5. Provide transitions to the next topic/subject matter that are clear.

6. Have clear topics introducing the subject matter being discussed.

7. The title page and bibliography does not count toward the required page total.